There are people who agree with the LGBTQIA+/Trans agenda that genuinely seem to care about kids who are struggling with what could be biological, mental and/or social issues. There are people who really want to help, and may think they are doing so based on following what has been proposed in recent years regarding potential legitimate issues. However, this politically driven fake movement pulling on heart strings to disguise harmful practices and illogical behavior is not what it claims to be.
In fact, this LGBTQIA+/Trans agenda does not care about you or the future of the Trans/LGBTQIA+ community. This fake fight for Tran’s rights and to protect Trans kids is politically driven and as we’ve seen with race and abortion, it is used for voter persuasion and driving a spectrum of predetermined outcomes. Like a drug dealer, they care that you get hooked on the product, but they will not be paying for your rehabilitation, and the damage may be irreversible.
The goal is to flush this out through commonsense and conversation. The not talking isn’t working. Make a good argument and don’t be afraid to defend your position. If the hill to die on isn’t when it’s time to protect the children, please show me the hill more worthy.
You are going to read this and see “They” or “Them” referenced. If you remember anything from this piece, remember that “They” or “Them” are not identities or self-selected pronouns. The controllers, the handlers, the people driving the narrative, and even the useful brainwashed idiots carrying the water are “They” and “Them”.
If you think “They” and “Them” don’t exist…
Yup, it’s a rocket launch start and it sounds a little crazy, but it can’t all just be an accident or coincidence.
Let’s see…
State of New Jersey
Policy
5756 – TRANSGENDER STUDENTS
“Approach
This policy establishes the Board’s expectations for addressing the needs of transgender students in compliance with applicable anti-discrimination laws. For grades 6 through 8, the school district shall accept a student’s asserted gender identity; parental consent is not required. For students in grades Pre-K through 5, the responsibility for determining a student’s gender identity rests with the student’s parents/guardians.”
Transgender Student Guidance for School Districts
Adopted: 18 November 2014
Revised: 20 October 2015
Revised: 12 March 2019
Revised: 20 June 2023
Search results from Bing:
Question: “how old are 6th graders in the United States”
Answer: “In the United States, 6th graders are typically 11 to 13 years old”
This policy instructs that by approximately 12 years of age in 6th grade, the child is now allowed to make the decision regarding gender identity including any preferred name requests, and the staff must comply. In addition, school districts do not require parental consent or even notification.
Part IV
Contrary to ridiculous school policies, celebrations of pride, or protests by believers of the pick your own gender world, there are only two; male and female. Which means an adult or child can play games with the word gender, but it doesn’t change the facts.
Do these word games provide a way for people to live out their fantasies, their lives as they see fit?
Yes, actually.
People have been playing out sexual fantasies for centuries. However, when fantasy seeking moves from private to public and school policy / government initiatives start driving outcome and harming children, it’s time to stop and see what is really afoot.
Typically, and with previous approaches when fielding questions from children regarding anything of a sexual or more mature manner; the “less is more” approach would be thought of as logical and prudent. Telling kids to ask their parents was even a thing at one point; if you can believe that?
Today, the pulling of heart strings to “protect” the children seems to have blinded people to the actual protection of children.
Logically, do people really believe we are protecting children by teaching them about alternative sexual lifestyles, acts, fantasies, and desires? Is mutilating a child, either with drugs or by surgery really passing as “gender affirming healthcare”? Oh, and get this, aside from removal all together, the so-called “gender affirming” surgeries only provides for two choices: male like parts or female like parts.
Furthermore, how are the details regarding the preferred sex partner, types of sexual actions/desires, or self-pleasuring appropriate in a school setting -especially with regards to younger children? Is teaching about the first gay this or first Trans that really being touted as an achievement worthy to be added to a lesson in school?
If these school policies were designed and implemented with the idea of fielding questions for a unified messaging approach and didn’t promote introduction ultimately leading to exploration, maybe middle ground could have been argued. Instead, this approach aims to introduce the conversation with young children, evolve it over time, and then cut the parent/guardian out completely by early adolescence.
The first lessons in early grades begin with “families can be different”.
OK, kind of seems harmless. Maybe they were just trying to prepare children for interactions that could potentially be awkward?
It then evolves into children being asked their preferred pronouns, education on “gender identity”, school policy that does not require parental consent or even notification, and books in school libraries of same sex children preforming sexual acts on one another. Maybe sexual related questions would arise from curious kids in class, but to dive in head first unprovoked pushing provocative information?
Simply put, there are children and adults being lured down a path of over sexualization that, ironically, is being marketed and advertised as protection for the children and celebrated with “pride” for their bravery to publicly participate. Once conditioned, some of these participants will proclaim their multitude of achievements while informing you of how you shall address them.
Well, what about the gay kid who gets bullied or the Trans kid who identifies as a girl and wants to play sports?
First, please explain what bullying is allowed in school? We have this set of protected categories that we must protect, so the question is, what category/group can be bullied? Which fights are allowed? Who is allowed to be targeted for any reason? What discrimination is allowed? The protected categories, just like the “protect the Trans community” narrative are nothing more than appeasement from institutions unwilling to do their job.
Secondly, and we’ll get into this more, is we need to speak the truth. If a child is a biological male and wants to compete in female sports; we must tell him the truth. If he chooses to dress like a female and live his life in an alternative lifestyle, fine, but the rules are the rules. We are not protecting nor helping anyone by lying to them about reality, and we certainly are not protecting girls by making them compete against boys.
The strange part is that the adults, parent/guardian, representative, teacher, principle, etc helping these efforts think they are doing some form of good or protecting kids. Alternatively, some sadly are just trying to keep their job and do not want to be the one who pushes back on this insanity.
Skipping the ladder; why?
Why do whoever they are and whatever role they assume, think that this is good?
Having this conversation without any of its history and trying to be fair is usually where all sides stop reading. In today’s polarized society there can’t be any middle ground. This is great for politicians and their handlers because they need divisive issues to drive narrative and ultimately outcome. This means the details are not to be discussed and you need to pick a team because mine cares more than yours.
The fight for same sex relationships and the perversion of children goes back a long way. This is not the setting for a deep-dive into the history, but for example, the rabbit whole regarding the perversion of children can take you all the back to Greece towards the end of the Archaic period. This is known as “The pederasty in ancient Greece“.
Plus, it’s important to note that these are two separate subjects, but they have crossed paths enough for people to want to throw the baby out with the bath water. This is probably because they do share some perverted characteristics which are where the lines get blurry. Particularly as of late, where we see these alternative lifestyles normalized through institutions, fashion, music, and other media.
It would appear most adults seem to understand the “rights” argument, where gay or lesbian couples want what traditional married couples would qualify for under the law. By the way, this is currently the law and has been for over a decade. However, making people adhere to pronoun demands and telling them what they do or do not see is not a “rights” issue.
Furthermore, this narrative to protect the Trans or LGBTQIA+ community laid the groundwork to present its need to be added to history and/or social studies because of the “struggles” they face in society. Once again, this is a step farther than normalization, by celebrating their achievement of being LGBTQIA+ while completing/doing whatever their task/achievement actually may have warranted.
This appears to stem from the theory of intersectionality.
Theories like intersectionality create a nexus point for connectivity with other similar areas of thought. This easily can become complicated because many of these theories or ideologies are surrounded with some truth but lack ultimately the facts needed to prove their consistency and credibility. This also makes arguments surrounding issues like the one we are diving into here more difficult to navigate.
Regardless of what you think is right or wrong with the above message in the picture from Trans Reads, it provides another link in the chain of this protect the Trans people narrative. It builds on the intersectionality premise providing the justification and ammo for the argument to “protect the trans students” because they are a “marginalized” group and therefore are making history with their achievements.
Aside from its controversial base ideas which is an argument for another piece. This intersectionality theory might actually make a good point, but maybe not for the reason Kimberlé Crenshaw initially intended.
In its simplest structure, removing the noise, she could have a very interesting notion. Meaning, when a person has a chip on their shoulder they may fight harder. A completely side thought to be argued another day, is whether a synthetic “chip on the shoulder” which makes a person work/fight harder is a good thing even if it’s not based on reality or the complete truth?
Anyway…
Skipping ahead to America in the past 75 or so years; take a look at this chart.
Some examples of the LGBT “rights” from this chart include being recognized as a protected class, being able to change your gender on your government issued ID, not being able to teach sexual orientation and gender identity in grades kindergarten to 3, and the fight between allowing gender affirming care for minors.
Here’s what the world looks like from EQUALDEX
Finally, let’s bring it back to New Jersey, which just makes it into the top 10 with a score of 84 out of 100.
Sammy Gibbons of northjersey.com wrote this story in December of 2023 and updated it in January of 2024:
Yes, this is out of control and we’re about to get to that. However, if we’re being fair, why should any ADULT who chooses a partner of any kind not enjoy the same benefits that any other married couple is eligible for under the law? We can argue whether it should be called a marriage, or if the ceremony should be held in a place of worship, and what’s acceptable within certain communities.
However, if we are being fair, denying Adults the same lawful treatment based on their partner choice is neither fairness nor freedom.
While people may disagree, if they are adults and that’s their choice; goose meet gander.
With all that being said, this was extremely rare, single digits, for thousands of years. Even in the past 100 years it was only 1% to 5% max of the population in America. Predictions based on how this is being injected into society show that this could be in double digits within the next generation.
Take a look at this report from Grand View Research.
So, why before this movement to protect the Trans community were the numbers so low?
The short answer is they didn’t have government backing with a Department of Education for deployment and implementation.
The historical answer is survival.
Before words could hurt people, they actually had to think about how to survive in life.
Historically, if a society was going to remain alive and thrive they would have to adhere to logical standards of survival for natural positive outcomes. So, while it wouldn’t be fair or in the essence of freedom to tell adults how they must live their lives, it should be clearly stated why respecting nature’s code is in the best interest of not only their life, but the people around them.
Just a short time ago, a quick exploration of our history from the founding of America would be all that was needed to understand how essential Christianity’s’ role was in creating a civil thriving society. However, as promised, just sticking to logic and commonsense.
The single most important point of any argument against this Protect the LGBTQIA+/Trans Community not based on religion or science etc, just commonsense and logic is telling the truth.
Meaning we can’t as a society pretend like same sex relationships are completely normal and therefore teaching little kids about them is justifiable. These are alternative to typical “normal” human behaviors based on natural logic.
Male and female bodies are different; for a reason.
Yes, nature has its rare situations; stay focused.
Regardless of temptation, likes, dislikes or whatever the reason given is, we have to tell the truth. Does that mean calling for the ousting of people who decide to live an alternative lifestyle? Well, as long as they’re not harming themselves or the people around them; no. Which is meant to say, it means being honest about their choice to live an alternative lifestyle, and what the ramifications of that choice could mean.
More importantly, it means telling kids that is it not normal to seek out the same sex for matrimonial relationships.
Pretending it is completely normal to pursue same sex relationships and that children can become whatever gender they choose, creates a false sense of reality. This is why the truth must be first and why it is the single most important point. If we do not lead with the truth we get what we are seeing now, a synthetic utopia that in reality is manifesting mental illness.
This isn’t like telling a child, “you can be whatever you want to be”, you know, like a doctor or a fireman. Those outcomes may be achievable. Changing your biological sex, at least for now, is not. And here is where we find ourselves at the fork in the road of truth and reality vs lies and fantasy. Gender ideology based on lies and fantasy is the harm we need to root out to heal our society and actually protect the children.
It should be easy to say; no matter what let’s try our hardest to protect kids from harm. However, this is where the complications creep into what seems like a clearly stated objective.
Remember, this perverted atrocity void of the truth is to “protect the kids”. Plus, if we are going to have freedom and liberty, we can’t tell people how to live and what to do. Hence why age plays such a vital part and why this multi-age wide spectrum attack is so methodically potent and dangerous to society.
Not such an easy issue to talk about; now is it?
In previous parts of this series some explanations were brought forward to help explain some of the reasons why this can be difficult. Some have to do with the kids, but most actually have to do with the adults.
Typically a confused child or young person would look to the adults around them for guidance. Well, what happens when adults are the ones misguiding the children? Whether it’s by mistake or by one’s own self motivations, the terrible outcome can prevail.
When these terrible outcomes are promoted and there are moral virtual signals surrounding a so called movement, the damage from something that sounds positive like “celebrating with pride” can leave in its wake a life in ruin.
What’s really telling is that this “movement” has grown quickly within governments, industry, and the corporate/healthcare world. Plus, as typically seen with political narrative shaping, it’s driven by popular fads/trends where celebrities are raising their children in opposite sex styles and people are flocking to social media to post videos determining their child’s gender post birth.
From the US to the UN and around the world there seems to be an agenda.
What is that agenda exactly?
Ultimately, it’s the same agenda it has always been; global societal control -which is much easier to achieve without the presence of strong intelligent minds, masculinity, religion, and traditional family/social structures.
Now that sounds a little crazy, right?
However, if what you are presented with is in the guise of its opposite and is used to channel and direct societies to global government determined outcomes; it starts to make total sense.
Stay with me
If something or someone wanted to control society, and they could convince that society that they were the one’s calling the shots; how better to do so? You get to choose your gender, your pronouns and tell other people they must accept it, and it’s backed by government and/or local school (government) policy. That’s all before getting into the sexual aspects of this sort of lifestyle.
This goes back to Sagalogic II when trying to understand how some of these agendas gain traction, acceptance, and adherence so quickly. First, the agenda items are older than you think. Look at how long they have been pushing this in society and particularly in universities.
Sadly, what we are seeing now, is the transcendence downward into the lower grade levels.
From Sagalogic II: “The third [reason] is about narrative, popularity, useful idiots and/or a lack of integrity, self-esteem, and independence as a person/society.”
Hence why, integrity, self-esteem, independence, strong intelligent minds, masculinity, and traditional social/family structures are not welcomed in these global initiatives. These characteristics do not produce obedient compliant subjects that can be manipulated for the advancement of an agenda with the objective of societal control.
You know because they’re the community’s kids now.
Imagine the irony. In the Age of DEI and acceptance, instead of celebrating our differences and embracing each other for them while debating ideas, we are now gas-lit that they are distinctions of the other team and we all must think the same.
The once simple teachings of manners and morals passed down throughout generations must be squelched as they are controlled by individuals, families; the People. In this new age, the rules will be decided amongst a few and the many will adhere or they’re transphobic, racist, fascists, or something like that.
Remember when comedians made fun of our differences and challenged us to laugh at each other? Sadly, this younger generation may not because it’s almost been removed from our societies. Comedians made a career out of making us laugh at our differences and the ridiculousness of what is now considered “politically correct” or “socially acceptable”.
Remember when we celebrated art, music, food, culture, and the wonderful additions by the different roots around the world that made up the melting pot that is America? We assimilated celebrating our rich cultures, and united as a nation we embraced our wonderful differences as a positive, as one nation, under go.. sorry –or at least it was a work in progress always striving to move in a better direction.
The lack of comedians and the ability to laugh at ourselves is a societal warning we should all take seriously. Comedy feeds the ability to be honest with ourselves, building a sense of humor that keeps our internal mirror in check and reminds us that we’re human.
Comedy stimulates humility which activates humbleness. Not to mention a good always needed laugh.
We all have an internal mirror, and if our reflection is working, it’s in tune with our conscience. This perversion of our proclivity for human reaction circumvents the essential development of our natural tools to interface with one another. Which is maybe why kids with face coverings, looking down at their phone, believing they’re weird or not special, are easily tricked into an alternative lifestyle.
We are allowing the ruling class and their useful idiots to use our heritage as a negative controlling tactic to divide us for the very reasons that make our great cultures divine; our beautiful imperfect different contributions.
As imperfect humans, Americans, we’ve learned the hard way that we make mistakes and even fought a Civil War. Hopefully, we’ll remember that valuing each other via character and those contributions is more important and morally sound than seeking synthetic distinctions for our divide.
What’s absolutely scary is that this new style agenda doesn’t need to burn the logs of division for its power; it’s just a convenient byproduct. This new approach persuades its target using the classic tactic of pressure, and an even more sinister one; pleasure.
Implementation starts like normal and consists of creating and controlling popular trends and shaping narratives. Why do politicians always get celebrities to come and speak to you on behalf of them? Why is it considered trendy when an actress raises her kids in opposite sex clothing styles?
Popularity sells, and controlling what is popular is key to narrative shaping. In addition, narrative control requires constant and extensive marketing especially if it’s not true. Repeat the lie, again and again; repeat the lie. We saw this with COVID.
McDonalds makes billions per year selling junk fast-food.
McDonalds is known globally by millions and many people eat at their local McDonalds every day.
Does this stop McDonalds from running commercials every day?
Ba-da-ba-ba-ba… You can hear it.
For this reason these different tactics are scary, particularly with kids. Plus, using pleasure is easier than division as it causes the person being controlled to want more because there is a feel good part of the equation. Remember the drug dealer analogy? Get them hooked and they’ll keep coming back.
It truly is a deeper and more jarring discovery that this mirrors addiction like behaviors in a lot of ways. There are LGBTQ/Trans support groups and meetings, and they preach some of the same group ideals and philosophies. Plus, just like addicts, some continue because they feel they have no place to go and/or it becomes routine.
“This is where I’m comfortable”
“I don’t know where else to go”
“These are my friends”
“I fit in here”
“It’s easier”
“You don’t understand”
With division there has to be a trigger, so to create angst, a wound of some sort, so They can pour on the proverbial salt. With pleasure, the target will seek it out because of the feel good factor.
The pleasure “feel good” tactic is complicated and interesting as it reveals itself in two ways. The feeling good and/or that feeling of doing something that’s good. Meaning, one might mentally or physically fulfill the “good feeling” via sexual pleasure, cross-dressing, personal identity expression, or something that feeds the personal thrill socially or physically.
It can also present as the feeling of contribution or righteousness, the “feeling of doing good” that comes from more of a virtue based societal affirmation for their “bravery”, and it’s celebrated with “pride” via public/social acceptance. Plus, let’s not forget how powerful and important peer acceptance, approval, and popularity can be with kids.
The pleasure argument is extraordinary because if you just examine this approach closely, you can see how it can play a major role in many life extremes and/or failures. Think of obesity, gambling, or any type of addiction. Having a bad day, just one more drink, smoke another, something to mentally exit reality for a little while or provide the needed disguise. It tastes so good I’m going to just keep eating, no matter the damage. Pleasure, pleasure, pleasure; give me more.
Now, think about how the acceptance of social and sexual pleasure seeking is being encouraged and packaged. It’s under the guise of protecting children because they ARE, not they MIGHT, be LGBTQIA+ or curious. It’s that they ARE whatever the flavor of the week is, and we must protect and celebrate their bravery only after coercion for proclaiming that they ARE.
How does this acceptance feel to a potentially nervous, shy, troubled, curious, unsure or potentially unstable, kid? Picture a salesman ringing the bell when the couple says yes after hours in a sales pitch as they decide to buy. They’re off the hook! The immediate pressure is gone. They ARE going to buy. The exchange is over, so there is a sort of instant relief from the pressure.
Before closing thoughts, it’s important to note why the participant’s willingness is celebrated with “pride”.
Look at the search results below.
Question: What is the opposite of pride?
Answer:
Humility
Modesty
Humbleness
Meekness
Shame
Humiliation
Misery
Abasement
Abashment
Degradation
Discomfort
Discomposure
Disgrace
Dregs
People can feel when something is not right. What happens when those feelings are redirected? Celebrating with pride seems to be an effort to cleanse the (pick a word – shame) of the initial gut reaction to what these individuals/groups seek to approve.
Plus, do you notice how these movements need your approval, not their own. You have to believe what they believe. It’s not enough for the LGBTQIA+/Trans people to believe it; you have to play pretend as well otherwise you’re somethingOphobic and possibly committing a hate crime.
Do you think all of this comes about naturally?
There is an agenda.
Change the trends by controlling the popular narratives; take over a crowd made vulnerable, and inject what is needed to push towards the predetermined outcome. If done with precision, it will create the self-sustaining ecosystem of compliant non-reproducing global citizens They’ve longed for.
Let’s start with say, that “alternative” group of kids at the high school, they should work just fine.
It’s very likely this did not start as a broad global agenda. Plus, there is only a small percentage needed to cause the needed affects. However, the indulgence of the societal byproduct from the powers that be watching the few pushing this perversion is telling.
This is where the innocence of a child’s natural instinct to personally build the self-awareness for shaping their character and integrity is misled and corrupted. Thus, their actual true identity is stolen.
The proclamation, “I identify as/with” fill in the blank; is nonsense. An adult or child can like something, advocate for it, promote it, adhere to its rules or participate etc. The problem is one’s identity is the opinion formed not only by one’s own self-perception, but by the other parties involved in that exchange.
This isn’t to say a person can’t build and shape their identity, or think confidently and positive of or for themselves. It’s meant to convey the idea that it’s more complicated then telling someone your name, age, or that you are gay or straight.
What does that even mean?
Simply put, you can’t just tell people what they see and who you are, they must be convinced through interaction.
A person can say I identify as a tree, the best player, the greatest mom or dad, a dolphin, a woman, or a man, but does that self-proclamation make it true? Does it appear true to the person they are interacting with?
Especially with kids, we see this raw honesty because of their innocence or maybe ignorance that provides them with this sort of natural immunity to bullshit. It’s not until they are swayed one way or another that they are willing to believe something their gut may have initially rejected.
We negotiate our identities everyday throughout life via human interactions.
The next time you read or hear someone say “I identify as/with”, just know that they are either not a serious person or have been tricked into thinking their self-identification is all that’s required.
identity:
1: the state or fact of remaining the same one or ones, as under varying aspects or conditions:
2: the condition of being oneself or itself, and not another:
3: condition or character as to who a person or what a thing is; the qualities, beliefs, etc., that distinguish or identify a person or thing:
4: the state or fact of being the same one as described.
Definitions 3 and 4 really drive the point home while also showing the complexity of the conversation. “Who a person or what a things is”. While 3 lists the word “beliefs” which opens up the conversation for proclamations such as “I identify as”, the definition finishes with “that distinguish or identify a person or thing”.
From what you’ve read, does this sound like something a child or young adult should be trying to untangle?
So why would anyone want to introduce this to young minds?
When you apply the agenda factor it exposes the deceit of the identity nonsense and what is actually being referred to that builds and defines a person or child’s character and being. This is why it doesn’t make sense to a lot of people trying to digest this perversion of reality.
From the time a child is born to when they gain enough consciousness and maturity to recognize their contribution and role in everyday situations, little by little, they become more aware of themselves and their actions. Obviously, this varies for many reasons.
During this journey they climb the mountains of life, such as nervousness, shyness, insecurities, and their fears. The mental and physical calluses from their work form to keep them safe and strong for what’s ahead -and this is exactly what this agenda is prepared to remove from our sons and daughters childhood.
It’s the hard things that build character, integrity, self-reliance, and drive. The first time she hits the mark in a dance recital, his first pitch from the mound in front of a crowd. Acing that test they studied so hard for, making that free throw shot under pressure in the forth. That look on a child’s face and that one of a kind genuine sound in their voice as they yell; “I did it”.
This is not only being taken from the parents might I selfishly add, but most importantly it’s being taken from the children. Their chance to offer life’s judgement of identity a fair fight to be the best they can be is systematically being preyed upon by people who either know what they are doing, or are misled, brainwashed, and weak minded, and therefore don’t.
This is why an approach of this sort, this agenda, is so dangerous and illogical. Setting up children for success by telling them the world will adhere to their commands is just silly. The fallout that will occur once reality sets in will be too much to bear. In addition, and depending on whether the child has been led down the road of some type of body alteration; even if they make it back mentally, they might physically never be the same.
How many children will have to be mutilated by doctors who swore an oath “to do no harm” before we take this serious as a society?
Are we really going to be the generation that teaches convenience and self-pleasure, rather than rewarding real achievements from acts of discipline and hard work?
It would be easier to cite studies of gender dysphoria, the horrible stories from de-transitioners, and long known opinions from doctors before they were given their new standards, but that hasn’t seemed to gain any traction in this polarized time in history. So, I just ask, what if they, you, me, are wrong? Can we at least find out together when the child is old enough to buy a pack of cigarettes, get a tattoo, or have a drink at a bar?
Thanks for reading.
Cited: Number of transgender children seeking treatment surges in U.S. (reuters.com)
U.S. Sex Reassignment Surgery Market Size Report, 2030
Finding Pride: Teaching Trans History in Secondary Social Studies | Trans Reads
New Jersey scores high in Human Rights Campaign LGBTQ+ equality report